Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
BRUS Wikipedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Incumbent
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Get shortened URL
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Anti-incumbency== {{main|Anti-incumbency}} However, there exist scenarios in which the incumbency factor itself leads to the downfall of the incumbent. Popularly known as the [[anti-incumbency|anti-incumbency factor]], situations of this kind occur when the incumbent has proven themself not worthy of office during their tenure and the challengers demonstrate this to the voters. An anti-incumbency factor can also be responsible for bringing down incumbents who have been in office for many successive terms despite performance indicators, simply because the voters are convinced by the challengers of a need for change. It is also argued that the holders of extensively powerful offices are subject to immense pressure which leaves them politically impotent and unable to command enough public confidence for re-election; such is the case, for example, with the [[President of France|Presidency of France]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.foreignpolicy.com/2017/05/02/francs-presidency-is-too-powerful-to-work-emmanuel-macron-elections/ |title=France's Presidency Is Too Powerful to Work |author=Robert Tombs |date=May 2, 2017 |publisher=Polling Report |access-date=December 3, 2017}}</ref> Voters who experience the negative [[Shock (economics)|economic shock]] of a loss of income are less likely to vote for an incumbent candidate than those who have not experienced such a shock.<ref name="Margalit">{{Cite journal|last=Margalit|first=Yotam|date=2019-05-11|title=Political Responses to Economic Shocks|journal=Annual Review of Political Science|language=en|volume=22|issue=1|pages=277β295|doi=10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-110713|issn=1094-2939|doi-access=free}}</ref> Nick Panagakis, a pollster, coined what he dubbed the ''incumbent rule'' in 1989βthat any voter who claims to be undecided towards the end of the election will probably end up voting for a challenger.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pollingreport.com/incumbent.htm |title=Incumbent Rule |author=Nick Panagakis |date=February 27, 1989 |publisher=Polling Report |access-date=February 5, 2016}}</ref> In France, the phenomenon is known by the catchphrase ''Sortez les sortants'' ("Get out the outgoing [representatives]!"), which was the slogan of the [[Poujadist]] movement in the [[1956 French legislative election]].
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to BRUS Wikipedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
BRUS Wikipedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)